GOOD|GOAT
← Projects & Initiatives/Litigation · Voter-Mandated Compliance/GG-2026-003
Litigation HoldActive Matter · Fund Diversion & Audit Failure
Matter GG-2026-003 · Maricopa County Superior Court

PHOENIX PARKS &

PRESERVES INITIATIVE.

Holding the City to the deal voters approved in 2008.

GOOD | GOAT, through counsel at Robinson Law Offices, has issued a litigation hold letter to the City of Phoenix concerning systemic failures to comply with voter-mandated restrictions on the Phoenix Parks and Preserves Initiative (3PI). Counsel has concluded that 3PI funds were used for golf-enterprise debt retirement contrary to ballot language, that “attestations” have been substituted for the annual public audit voters approved, and that material expenditures have been concealed from the Oversight Committee.

Case Caption
Plaintiff
GOOD | GOAT (Government Oversight & Accountability Team)
v.
Defendant
City of Phoenix
Court
Maricopa County Superior Court · Civil Division · Phoenix, AZ
Docket
{CV2026-XXXXXX}
Counsel
Joshua W. Carden, Robinson Law Offices
Status
Pre-Litigation · Hold Letter Delivered
Filed
Hold Letter served Feb 10, 2026
Cause
Enforcement of voter-approved restrictions on 3PI funds (Prop. A, 2008); failure of voter-mandated annual public audit; ultra vires expenditures.
matter:GG-2026-003
docket:{CV2026-XXXXXX}
filed:2026-02-10
status:pre-litigation · hold letter served
next:response review · meet & confer
Statement of the Case

Voters approved a deal in 2008. The City rewrote it.

“Voter approval is limited to the purposes disclosed to voters at the time of the election.” — Friedman v. Cave Creek USD No. 93, 231 Ariz. 567 (App. 2013).

In 2008, Phoenix voters approved Proposition A — extending the Phoenix Parks and Preserves Initiative — on three express conditions: a restricted purpose, an independent citizens’ oversight committee, and an annual public audit. Counsel has concluded the City has failed all three.

Restricted 3PI funds were used to retire golf-enterprise debt — a purpose never put to voters. The annual audit was replaced with a management-controlled “attestation” that the City itself has admitted is not an audit. Material expenditures, including a $1.85M Papago Golf Course debt purchase, were not properly classified for the Oversight Committee.

GOOD | GOAT served a hold letter on February 10, 2026. The City Attorney responded on February 20. The matter is now in the meet-and-confer window before formal filing.

Matter Details
Matter ID
GG-2026-003
Court
Maricopa County Superior Court
Docket
{CV2026-XXXXXX}
Plaintiff
GOOD | GOAT
Defendant
City of Phoenix
Counsel
Joshua W. Carden
Firm
Robinson Law Offices
Status
Pre-Litigation · Hold Letter Delivered
Hold Letter
Feb 10, 2026
City Resp.
Feb 20, 2026
All filings are public-record copies. Workpapers and discovery materials are not yet public.
The Three Promises

What the 2008 ballot pamphlet said. Word for word.

I

Restricted Purpose

3PI funds may be used only for purposes disclosed in the 2008 election materials — 60% parks, 40% preserves, with itemized permitted uses.

II

Citizen Oversight

All 3PI expenditures must be reviewed by an independent citizens' oversight committee — not pre-cleared, not handed drafts, not bypassed.

III

Annual Public Audit

Expenditures must be subject to an annual public audit. Not an attestation. Not a management assertion. An audit — the kind voters understand when they vote yes.

Claims for Relief

Four counts. Each independently sufficient. Together, dispositive.

COUNT I

Unauthorized Use of Restricted Funds

3PI funds were used to retire golf-enterprise debt — a use never disclosed to voters in the 2008 ballot pamphlet. Arizona courts hold that voter approval is limited to the purposes disclosed at election time.

Authorities
Prop. A (2008) Publicity Pamphlet · Friedman v. Cave Creek USD No. 93, 231 Ariz. 567
COUNT II

Failure of Voter-Mandated Annual Audit

Voters required an annual public audit. The City has substituted a management-controlled "Independent Accountant's Report on Examination of an Assertion" — which the City has admitted "is not considered an audit." Attestations are not audits.

Authorities
Prop. A (2008) · Audit Condition · City admission, Jan. 30, 2023
COUNT III

Misclassification & Concealment

The 2011 Papago Golf Course debt purchase ($1.85M of 3PI funds) was not described to the Oversight Committee as a debt-retirement transaction — depriving the Committee of its voter-mandated review role.

Authorities
Ord. S-38393 (Dec. 14, 2011) · 3PI Oversight Committee compliance reports
COUNT IV

Record-Keeping & Disclosure Failures

The City was unable to produce working papers supporting material compliance representations and initially denied the existence of the $7.15M Sonoran Preserve Acquisition project number — a breakdown in basic record-keeping duties.

Authorities
A.R.S. § 39-121 · Project No. PA75100168
Filings & Evidence

The paper trail.

Ex.
Document
Date
Type
EX-A
Independent Legal Opinion
Robinson Law Offices · Joshua W. Carden · 6 pages
Feb 10, 2026
PDF · Filed
EX-B
Hold Letter & Preservation Demand
GOOD | GOAT to 3PI Oversight Committee
Feb 10, 2026
PDF · Filed
EX-C
City Attorney Response
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney · Civil Division · 3 pages
Feb 20, 2026
PDF · Received
EX-D
2008 Proposition A Publicity Pamphlet
City of Phoenix · 60/40 fund-use language
May 20, 2008
Public Record
EX-E
Ord. S-38393 — Papago Golf Course Debt Purchase
Phoenix City Council · $1.85M from 3PI
Dec 14, 2011
Public Record
EX-F
FY 2022 Independent Accountant's Report
Project No. PA75100168 · Sonoran Preserve Acquisition · $7.15M
FY 2022
Public Record
All documents available on request to press@goodgoat.net. Privileged communications excluded.
Docket

Pre-filing record.

Every step has been documented. Next milestone: meet-and-confer with City Attorney’s office, or formal complaint filed in Superior Court.

Feb 20, 2026
City Attorney Julie M. Kriegh issues written response disputing claims; asserts mootness, statute of limitations, and that attestation satisfies audit requirement
Feb 10, 2026
Hold Letter delivered to 3PI Oversight Committee; preservation demand issued to all custodians of 3PI records
Feb 10, 2026
Independent Legal Opinion (Robinson Law Offices) finalized — concludes substantial and systemic compliance failures
Jan 19, 2024
3PI Oversight Committee meeting — accountant clarifies that ACFR audit, not Attestation, is the audit referenced in Proposition A
Jan 30, 2023
City public-records response: examination presented to Oversight Committee "is not considered an audit"
Jul 6, 2017
Council Ord. S-43701 — directs land-sale proceeds to replenish 3PI fund (cited by City as resolving golf controversy)
Dec 14, 2011
Council Ord. S-38393 — authorizes purchase of Papago Golf Course debt for $1.85M using 3PI funds
May 20, 2008
Voters approve Proposition A — the Phoenix Parks and Preserves Initiative — with restricted-purpose, citizen-oversight, and annual-public-audit conditions
Counsel of Record
Joshua W. Carden
Robinson Law Offices
202 E. Earll Drive, Ste. 490
Phoenix, Arizona 85012
(602) 844-8610 · joshua@robinsonlawoffices.com
Plaintiff
GOOD | GOAT
Government Oversight & Accountability Team
Jerry Van Gasse, President
jerryvangasse@hotmail.com
Press & Inquiries
press@goodgoat.net
Interview requests: 14-day lead time preferred.
Document requests: include exhibit number and date range.
Matter GG-2026-003 · 3PI Compliance